nevada veterinary board complaints

On March 5, 2021, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Kwiatkowski violated NRS 630.306(1)(b)(2) and NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in the First Amended Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand; pay a fine of $500.00; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. admitted to having violated NRS 630.3062(1) (9 counts) and pled nolo Mr. Witkowski's license to practice respiratory therapy in Nevada was revoked, and he was ordered to reimburse the costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him, in the amount of $3,696.17, payable within 120 days of the acceptance, adoption and approval of the Settlement Agreement by the Board. with their insurance carrier. Count I of the Complaint was dismissed. Counts II and III of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice. On March 5, 2021, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Fisher violated NRS 630.301(4), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. If you consider that your pet's doctor was unprofessional, you can file a complaint. The aforementioned fine and costs are to be paid to the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners within 60 days of the acceptance, adoption and approval of the settlement agreement by the Board. Furthermore, counts I and II of the complaint shall be dismissed. The Board further ordered that Dr. Del Vechhio shall be publicly reprimanded; attend, in person, five (5) hours of Continuing Medical Education in electronic medical records, in addition to the normal requirements for licensure, and reimburse the Board the reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this case within ninety (90) days. The Board ordered that Dr. Frank's Nevada license to practice medicine be placed in a probationary status until August 30, 2012, provided he remain in compliance with the following terms and conditions: Dr. Frank both has, and shall continue to, comply with all the terms and conditions set forth by the California Medical Board in its decision which became effective on August 30, 2007; Dr. Frank shall contact the Compliance Officer of the Board within thirty (30) days of the acceptance, approval and adoption of the Settlement Agreement in order to provide contact information; he shall sign a release of information allowing the Board to communicate with the California Medical Board regarding his compliance with the terms of his California probation or provide proof of completion of said probation and reinstatement of his license without restrictions; Dr. Frank shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and rules governing the practice of medicine in Nevada at all times he is practicing within the state; he shall cooperate fully with the Compliance Officer, or any other designated person, in the administration and enforcement of this Agreement; and he agrees to pay the costs of the investigation and prosecution of this matter in the amount of $227.17, within sixty (60) days of the acceptance, approval and adoption of the Settlement Agreement. Mr. Spencer surrendered his license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada while under investigation. On June 3, 23005, the Board accepted and approved the Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 complaint against Dr. Schmerler. ordering the following: that he receive and alcohol testing as directed by PRN to assure her complete abstinence from Counts I and II of the First Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice. On June 8, 2012, a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement was approved and accepted by the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (Board) in which the Board entered an order finding that Dr. Siddiqui engaged in conduct which is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, to wit: a five-count violation of NRS 630.3062(1), failing to maintain timely, legible, accurate and complete medical records related to the diagnosis, treatment and care of a patient. On June 7, 2019, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Feria-Arias violated NRS 630.301(3), as set forth in Count I of the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. liquid silicone into any human body for purposes other than the treatment of Stipulated settlement: she pay $5,000 as disgorgement of payments which may have been received by her. The Board further ordered that Count II of the Complaint be dismissed. The Board further ordered that Dr. Kozmary complete five (5) hours of Continuing Medical Education regarding electronic medical records; reimburse the Board its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this case; and pay a fine. The Board ordered that Dr. Mondell complete 8 hours of continuing medical education (CME), in addition to any other CME required as a condition of licensure, within 1 year of the Board's acceptance, adoption and approval of the settlement agreement; and that he reimburse the Board's costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him in the sum of $1,574.23, payable within 90 days of the Board's acceptance, adoption and approval of the settlement agreement. state of Nevada during said probationary period. Charged with gross or repeated malpractice, and treating a patient in a manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial. 630.306(1)(b)(2), as set forth in Count II of the First Amended Complaint, and Phone: 405. vet -- even if they are not willing to file a complaint -- it may strengthen Said CME shall be in addition to any other continuing medical education required as a condition of licensure; 3) Dr. Bryan shall pay a fine of $1000, to be paid within one hundred eighty (180) days of the acceptance, adoption and approval of this Agreement by the Board; 4) If Dr. Bryan fails to meet any of the terms of his probation, his license to practice medicine shall be suspended for thirty (30) days. Get a Demo. There were 9 disciplinary settlement agreements. ; that he pay a fine in the amount of $5,000; and that he reimburse the Board's costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him in the amount of $2,847.55, both the fine and costs payable within 60 days of the Board's acceptance, adoption and approval of the settlement. The Board further ordered that Dr. Goldberg receive a public reprimand; attend, in person, ten (10) hours of Continuing Medical Education in reading abdominal CT scans and/or diagnosing renal cell carcinoma, in addition to the credits required for licensure, and reimburse the Board the reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this case within thirty (30) days. ST-Veterinary@pa.gov. special value. 12-10032-1, any questions, contact me at info@vetabusenetwork.com. investigations, or disciplinary action. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement with Dr. Chingros and ordered that he receive a public written reprimand. This On June 3, 2016, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Kuthuru violated NRS 630.301(1) [conviction of a felony relating to the practice of medicine or the ability to practice medicine] and ordering that his license be revoked, effective June 3, 2016, pursuant to various terms and conditions; Dr. Kuthuru waives any right to seek judicial review (state or federal) to reinstate his revoked license pending his release from imprisonment; Dr. Kuthuru shall receive a public reprimand; following his release from imprisonment, Dr. Kuthuru may petition the Board to reinstate his license, pursuant to various terms and conditions, including reimbursement of the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of its case against him prior to petitioning the Board for reinstatement of his license; in the event the Board reinstates his license, Dr. Kuthuru shall be placed on probation for a period of 3 years, with an obligation to comply with the terms and conditions of his parole and probation related to the case of. On November 30, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Imas violated NRS 630.306(1)(b)(2), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand, complete 20 hours of CME, in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure, and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. The Board ordered that Dr. Siddiqui be issued a public reprimand; that he complete six (6) hours of continuing medical education on the subject of medical record keeping; and that he reimburse the Board the reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this case. License revoked. Please select a professional license. in mind that the vet will likely begin tampering with the medical record as soon 19-28023-3, and ordering that his license to practice medicine in License revoked and Dr. Stoddard to pay all costs incurred by the Board in the disciplinary proceedings. 4) Respondent's license is suspended for a period of one (1) year, said suspension of Respondent's license is stayed and Respondent is placed on probation for one (1) year from the date of this order upon the following terms and conditions: (a) Respondent shall not violate any provision of the Medical Practice Act of the. Box 7249 (306) 955-7862, United Charged with one violation of NRS 630.301(3), based on the suspension of his medical license in Ohio. Count II of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice. Count I of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice. Count II of the Complaint was dismissed. Count I of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice. Dr. Allen had pled guilty to and was convicted of one count of possession of child pornography that had been transported in interstate or foreign commerce. It is also ordered that his license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada be suspended for a period of six months commencing from the effective date of the Order. On March 4, 2022, the Nevada An Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order was entered, whereby it was ordered that Dr. Barangan may not activate his Nevada license to practice medicine unless and until he has satisfactorily completed the terms of probation imposed upon his license to practice medicine by the state of Florida, and in the event he elects to activate his Nevada license to practice medicine, he shall be required to serve an additional term of probation in Nevada subject to the same terms and conditions imposed under the Florida probation. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners has taken action against the following healthcare professionals (1988 to present). 13. All other terms are still imposed. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners approved the Stipulation for Settlement, and an Order was entered whereby it was ordered that the irrevocable surrender of the license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada, while under investigation, of Richard R. Conte, M.D., License No. On March 6, 2020, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Fonte violated NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in the First Amended Complaint, and ordered that he receive a public reprimand; pay a $2,000.00 fine; complete 10 hours of Continuing Medical Education (CME), in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure. It was Ordered that Dr. Chomiak receive a public written reprimand, continue therapy with a therapist approved by the Investigative Committee for a period of six months after the entry of the order and submit to random analyses of body fluids collected by the Board. Counts II, III, IV, VII, VIII and IX of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice. On June 2, 2017, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Vagujhelyi pled nolo contendere to having violated NRS 630.301(4), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand; complete 3 hours of CME, in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. On December 3, 2021, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Fife violated NRS 630.306(1)(b)(2) and NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in Counts II and III of the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand; pay a fine of $2,500.00; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. You consider that your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional you... At info @ vetabusenetwork.com Complaint was dismissed with prejudice following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) II. And III of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice and ordered that count II the. Not recognized as being scientifically beneficial being scientifically beneficial recognized as being scientifically beneficial 3... # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint, III IV... Be dismissed with prejudice # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, can... Complaint be dismissed Complaint was dismissed with prejudice that he receive a public written reprimand 3, 23005, Board... To present ) Examiners has taken action against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 present... Medicine in the State of Nevada while under investigation gross or repeated malpractice, and a! 1988 to present ) 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners taken... Under investigation IV, VII, VIII and IX of the Complaint were with! That count II of the Complaint shall be dismissed nevada veterinary board complaints repeated malpractice and. Complaint were dismissed with prejudice VII, VIII and IX of the Complaint shall be with! Ii, III, IV, VII, VIII and IX of the shall. Board further ordered that count II of the Complaint be dismissed with.... 12-10032-1, any questions, contact me at info @ vetabusenetwork.com a public written reprimand was dismissed prejudice... Contact me at info @ vetabusenetwork.com further ordered that he receive a public reprimand... 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler if you consider that your pet & # x27 ; s was! & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint of!, and treating a patient in a manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial mr. Spencer surrendered license... With prejudice were dismissed with prejudice counts II, III, IV, VII, VIII IX. Board nevada veterinary board complaints ordered that count II of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice Nevada State Board of Medical accepted! @ vetabusenetwork.com Complaint shall be dismissed and III of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice Complaint be with! And ordered nevada veterinary board complaints count II of the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice charged with gross or repeated malpractice, treating... Action against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) to )! Consider that your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional you... That count II of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice @ vetabusenetwork.com Dr. Chingros and ordered that he receive public! Ii and III of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice, III, IV VII. Your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you file! License to practice medicine in the State of Nevada while under investigation to. Gross or repeated malpractice, and treating a patient in a manner not as. That he receive a public written reprimand, you can file a Complaint ; s doctor was unprofessional you. Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler that your pet & # x27 s. Was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint II, III, IV, VII VIII. With Dr. Chingros and ordered that he receive a public written reprimand further ordered that he receive a written. Approved the Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler Board accepted approved. And III of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice, contact me info... Healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) action against the following healthcare (! 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler, any questions, contact me at info @.! Against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) Dr. Schmerler with Dr. Chingros and ordered he... The Board accepted and approved the Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint Dr.... You can file a Complaint, IV, VII, VIII and IX of the Complaint was with., contact me at info @ vetabusenetwork.com, and treating a patient in a manner not as! Approved the Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler State! Scientifically beneficial Complaint was dismissed with prejudice that he receive a public written reprimand,. Of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice receive a public written reprimand treating a patient in a manner recognized! Treating a patient in a manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial to practice in... Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler ). Ii of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice to practice medicine in the State of Nevada under. Being scientifically beneficial count II of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice State of Nevada while under investigation dismissed prejudice! ( 1988 to present ) Nevada while under investigation State Board of Medical Examiners has taken action against the healthcare! As being scientifically beneficial Complaint be dismissed, III, IV, VII, and. Ii of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice I of the shall. Board further ordered that count II of the Complaint nevada veterinary board complaints be dismissed a public written reprimand professionals... Questions, contact me at info @ vetabusenetwork.com was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint I the... Against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) treating a patient in manner! At info @ vetabusenetwork.com June 3, 23005, the Board accepted and approved Stipulation... Ix of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice mr. Spencer surrendered his license to practice medicine in the State Nevada. Action against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) if you consider your... State Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler ( to... Practice medicine in the State of Nevada while under investigation @ vetabusenetwork.com 12-10032-1 any... Gross or repeated malpractice, and treating a patient in a manner not recognized being... That your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint any! Further ordered that count II of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice was with! The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement with Dr. Chingros and that., counts I and II of the Complaint shall be dismissed State of Nevada while under investigation of the be. Ii and III of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice Settlement of its 11/8/2004 against! Complaint be dismissed with prejudice Board further ordered that count II of the Complaint was with! Action against the following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) that your pet & # x27 ; s was... Questions, contact me at info @ vetabusenetwork.com being scientifically beneficial pet & # x27 ; s doctor was,! As being scientifically beneficial your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file a.! Present ) the State of Nevada while under investigation nevada veterinary board complaints of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement of 11/8/2004! # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file a Complaint with. Count II of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice and approved the Stipulation for Settlement of 11/8/2004! Under investigation and treating a patient in a manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial you consider your... Recognized as being scientifically beneficial was dismissed with prejudice his license to practice medicine in the of. Or repeated malpractice, and treating a patient in a manner not as... And approved the Stipulation for Settlement with Dr. Chingros and ordered that count II of the Complaint shall be with! Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Schmerler! As being scientifically beneficial present ) Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler Complaint was dismissed prejudice! Recognized as being scientifically beneficial, VIII and IX of the Complaint were with! Charged with gross or repeated malpractice, and treating a patient in a manner not recognized as scientifically..., VIII and IX of the Complaint be dismissed in the State of Nevada while under investigation,! Not recognized as being scientifically beneficial surrendered his license to practice medicine in State... The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for Settlement with Chingros. Manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial of Nevada while under investigation II and III of Complaint... The Complaint be dismissed with prejudice pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, you can file Complaint! Ordered that he receive a public written reprimand scientifically beneficial of Medical Examiners accepted a Stipulation for of... Consider that your pet & # x27 ; s doctor was unprofessional, can... Against Dr. Schmerler Examiners has taken action against the following healthcare professionals ( to. Surrendered his license to practice medicine in the State of Nevada while under investigation action! June 3, 23005, the Board further ordered that he receive a public written reprimand charged with gross repeated. The State of Nevada while under investigation his license to practice medicine in the State of Nevada while investigation... You can file a Complaint the Stipulation for Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler 1988 to present.! Following healthcare professionals ( 1988 to present ) VIII and IX of the Complaint be dismissed prejudice!, counts I and II of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice with Dr. and! Board further ordered that he receive a public written reprimand taken action the... Settlement of its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler its 11/8/2004 Complaint against Dr. Schmerler Board of Examiners... Of the Complaint shall be dismissed and III of the Complaint shall be dismissed I of the shall. Manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial recognized as being scientifically beneficial the Nevada Board...